Prediction of Gianluca Pozzi vs Jeremy Bates Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Pozzi vs J. Bates
Gianluca Pozzi
ITA
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
60
Age
63
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
138
Best Rank
63
1
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Jeremy Bates
GBR
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
60
Age
63
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
138
Best Rank
63
1
Total Titles
1
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Pozzi 1 - 2 Bates
They have played 8 sets in total, with Gianluca Pozzi winning 2 and Jeremy Bates winning 6. The last match between Jeremy Bates and Gianluca Pozzi was at the Wimbledon, 20-06-1994, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Jeremy Bates getting the victory 7-5 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pozzi | 1 |
| Bates | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) Wimbledon(06-20-94)
Jeremy Bates
7
6
6
Gianluca Pozzi
5
4
1
(R4) Tel Aviv(10-16-89)
Gianluca Pozzi
6
6
Jeremy Bates
2
2
(R2) Australian Open(01-16-89)
Jeremy Bates
6
6
6
Gianluca Pozzi
4
3
4
G. Pozzi vs J. Bates H2H Profile
G. Pozzi vs J. Bates Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gianluca Pozzi has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jeremy Bates has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gianluca Pozzi, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jeremy Bates has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gianluca Pozzi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jeremy Bates has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gianluca Pozzi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jeremy Bates winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gianluca Pozzi has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 56/46), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 28/56). Jeremy Bates has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 3/3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 34% (W/L 25/48).
- Player level: In the last year, Gianluca Pozzi has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jeremy Bates has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Gianluca Pozzi winning 1 times and Jeremy Bates being victorious 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Gianluca Pozzi winning 2 and Jeremy Bates winning 6.
- The last match between Gianluca Pozzi and Jeremy Bates was at the Wimbledon, 20-06-1994, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Jeremy Bates getting the victory 7-5 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gianluca Pozzi has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jeremy Bates has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gianluca Pozzi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jeremy Bates has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gianluca Pozzi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jeremy Bates has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Gianluca Pozzi vs Jeremy Bates Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Pozzi vs J. Bates H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Pozzi 0%, Bates 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Pozzi 0%, Bates 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Pozzi 0%, Bates 0%.
G. Pozzi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Milan Indoors - Milan - 31-01-2005 | ||||
Q1  Nenad ZimonjicN. Zimonjic | L | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | ||
 VIII Torneo Internazionale di Tennis - Barletta - 29-03-2004 | ||||
R1  Stephane RobertS. Robert | L | 6-2 1-6 6-2 | ||
| Milan Indoors - Milan - 09-02-2004 | ||||
Q1  Dmitri SitakD. Sitak | W | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||
Q3  Ivo HeubergerI. Heuberger | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q2 Michael LammerM. Lammer | W | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | ||
J. Bates Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wimbledon - 24-06-1996 | ||||
R1  Nicolas PereiraN. Pereira | L | 6-2 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Queen's Club - 10-06-1996 | ||||
R1  Jared PalmerJ. Palmer | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Shanghai - 29-01-1996 | ||||
R1 Jeff TarangoJ. Tarango | L | 6-4 7-6(3) | ||
| Beijing - 16-10-1995 | ||||
R2 Michael ChangM. Chang | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1  Albert ChangA. Chang | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
G. Pozzi vs J. Bates Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47.58% (324/357) | YTD Win/Loss | 41.87% (157/218) |
| 47.67% (807/886) | Sets Win/Loss | 43.21% (417/548) |
| 48.93% (7910/8255) | Games Win/Loss | 47.38% (4382/4866) |
| 47.73% (147/161) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.44% (68/85) |
| 33.33% (28/56) | Clay Win/Loss | 34.25% (25/48) |
| 49.73% (93/94) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.33% (23/37) |
| 54.90% (56/46) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.07% (41/48) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 334.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 303.36 |
| 38.57% (27/43) | Slam W/L | 36.84% (21/36) |
| 35.48% (22/40) | Masters W/L | 16.67% (2/10) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (9/6) |
| 44.31% (148/186) | Main Tour W/L | 42.41% (95/129) |
| 59.33% (124/85) | Challenger W/L | 44.62% (29/36) |
| 49% (297/612) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (129/303) |
| 37% (25/67) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (26/69) |
| 54% (99/183) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (22/46) |
| 49% (112/229) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (56/115) |
| 83% (298/246) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 74% (164/122) |
| 17% (298/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 24% (164/40) |
| 20% (383/76) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (211/34) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 13 Dec, 10:00 AM
PredictionO. Barisq
M. HoppW1
1.53
W2
2.31
Sat, 13 Dec, 11:00 AM
PredictionH. ShaikhY. BartashevichW1
2.24
W2
1.56
Sat, 13 Dec, 10:00 AM
Prediction
D. N. MadarasSE
M. D. Krom3W1
1.182
W2
4.15
Sat, 13 Dec, 12:00 PM
PredictionN. Berecoechea6
F. Curmi2W1
1.87
W2
1.81
Sat, 13 Dec, 11:00 AM
PredictionK. Dunneq
D. Khomutsianskaya8W1
2.2
W2
1.58
Sat, 13 Dec, 08:30 PM
PredictionA. FriedsamE. Jacquemot2W1
2.24
W2
1.56
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Anna Siskova vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Cristina Bucsa vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Cristina Bucsa vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
12 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Anhelina Kalinina vs Alycia Parks Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
11 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Shuai Zhang vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 11th December 2025 Best Bets
11 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Gabriela Andrea Knutson vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 11th December 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions TodayHibah ShaikhYara BartashevichKaty DunneDaria KhomutsianskayaAnna-Lena FriedsamElsa Jacquemot
Cristina Bucsa
Anhelina KalininaOzan BarisMichel HoppSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
Hibah ShaikhYara Bartashevich11:00
H2H 0-0
Katy DunneDaria Khomutsianskaya11:00
H2H 0-0
Anna-Lena FriedsamElsa Jacquemot18:00
H2H 0-0
Cristina BucsaAnhelina Kalinina18:30
H2H 0-0
Ozan BarisMichel Hopp10:00
H2H 0-0
